Compassion Benchmark
Free benchmark research · independent · updated weekdays

Compare how 1,286 institutions recognize and reduce suffering

Governments, corporations, AI labs, robotics labs, and cities — all ranked on the same 8-dimension, 0–100 ruler, sourced from public evidence, free to browse.

The benchmark uses identical criteria across all 8 indexes. A score of 50 means the same thing whether it appears in the Countries Index or the Fortune 500 Index — enabling direct comparison across sectors for the first time.

8Published index families
1,286Entities benchmarked
8Core benchmark dimensions
FreeAll public rankings, no paywall

Three ways to start

GoalWhere to go
Browse rankingsPick an index below — all free
Understand the methodRead the Methodology page
Read today's briefingGo to Daily Briefing
Search a specific entityUse entity search below
Get a research reportPurchase Research catalog

Public rankings are independent. Paid products support access and interpretation — never paid score changes.

Daily briefing — July 22, 2026

Fourteen scores hold steady overnight, while a device recall leaves Baxter International's score unresolved.

Full briefing →
Baxter International-5.9Kampala-2.6Chittagong+2.4+1 confirmed

Methodology

Every score in every index is built on the same 8-dimension, 40-subdimension framework — with publicly documented anchor scales, an evidence hierarchy, and a human approval gate. Read the full methodology to understand what a score means before you cite it.

Read the methodology →

How to read every index

All 8 indexes share one framework: 8 dimensions, 40 subdimensions, scored 0–100, assigned to one of five bands. The composite score is directly comparable across all indexes — a 59 in Countries means the same as a 59 in Fortune 500. Search results, index cards, and entity pages all use this common ruler.

How to read the scores

The 0–100 scale — five bands

Every entity — state, corporation, AI lab, robotics lab, or city — is scored 0–100 across 8 dimensions and 40 subdimensions. The composite score places the entity in one of five bands:

Critical0–20Foundational compassion practices are absent or documented active harm is present.
Developing20–40Some practices are emerging but remain inconsistent, reactive, or unevenly applied.
Functional40–60Core practices exist and meet a basic bar, with significant gaps remaining.
Established60–80Practices are systematic, documented, and supported by consistent evidence.
Exemplary80–100Practices are independently verified, consistent, and sustained under pressure.

The 8 dimensions

Each dimension is scored 1–5 across 5 subdimensions (40 subdimensions total), then converted to a 0–100 composite. A score of 1.0 on a subdimension represents the minimum anchor; 5.0 is exemplary conduct.

AWRAwarenessDoes this entity reliably detect when others are in pain or need — before they name it?
EMPEmpathyDoes this entity genuinely connect with the inner experience of those it serves?
ACTActionDoes compassionate understanding translate into real, proportional, effective help?
EQUEquityIs care distributed fairly — especially toward those with greatest need and least power?
BNDBoundariesIs helping sustainable, ethical, and autonomy-preserving — not dependency-creating?
ACCAccountabilityDoes this entity own its failures, correct course, and make genuine repair?
SYSSystemic ThinkingDoes compassion extend to root causes and structural change — not only symptom relief?
INTIntegrityIs compassion genuine, consistent, and non-performative — especially when it costs something?

Scores are based on public evidence — government reports, regulatory filings, independent audits, judicial findings, and verifiable third-party records. Entities never pay for inclusion, score changes, or suppression of findings. Full methodology

Mean compassion score by index — 2026 (which index should I open first?)

Each bar shows the mean composite score across all entities in that index. Sorted highest to lowest. Band color reflects the mean band. Reference line at the overall cross-index mean (42.2).

Robotics Labs56.7n=1Universities46.2n=1U.S. States45.4n=1AI Labs43.4n=1Fortune 50039.1n=1U.S. Cities38.1n=1Countries36.4n=1Global Cities32.6n=1mean 42.2

Source: Compassion Benchmark · CC-BY

Current indexes

Eight index families. All 1,286 entities — governments, companies, AI labs, robotics labs, cities, and universities — scored on the same 8-dimension, 0–100 ruler, making cross-sector comparison possible.

2026GovernmentsFirst Published Report

Countries Index

193 countries and territories on the same ruler as every other index.

Mean score 36.4 — countries show the widest band spread of any index; the Critical cluster reflects sustained documented harm patterns.

View Countries Index →

2026Public Systems

U.S. States Index

51 entities. Same 8-dimension ruler as every other index.

Mean score 45.4 — U.S. public systems sit in the Functional band with notable equity gaps across healthcare access and accountability.

View index →

2026Corporations

Fortune 500 Index

448 entities. Same 8-dimension ruler as every other index.

Mean score 39.1 — major corporations cluster in Developing; labor, equity, and accountability gaps are the primary scoring drivers.

View index →

2026AI

AI Labs Index

50 entities. Same 8-dimension ruler as every other index.

Mean score 43.4 — AI labs sit in Functional on average; the widest spread of any index, from Critical to Exemplary, reflects divergent safety postures.

View index →

2026Robotics

Humanoid Robotics Labs Index

50 entities. Same 8-dimension ruler as every other index.

Mean score 56.7 — the highest-mean index; robotics labs score well on awareness and intent but show gaps on governance and deployment risk.

View index →

2026U.S. Cities

U.S. Cities Index

144 entities. Same 8-dimension ruler as every other index.

Mean score 38.1 — U.S. cities span Critical to Functional; housing, homelessness response, and public health access are the most variable dimensions.

View index →

2026Global Cities

Global Cities Index

250 entities. Same 8-dimension ruler as every other index.

Mean score 32.6 — the lowest-mean index; global cities track closely with their national government scores, especially on equity and accountability.

View index →

2026Education

Universities Index

100 entities. Same 8-dimension ruler as every other index.

Mean score 46.2 — universities score in the Functional band on average; equity access and boundary accountability are the most variable dimensions across institutions.

View index →

Now available

The first published Compassion Benchmark research report is live

The 2026 Countries Compassion Benchmark Index is now available for direct purchase as the first published flagship digital report from Compassion Benchmark.

This Individual Research License edition goes beyond the public countries page and includes the complete benchmark PDF with full rankings, methodology, key findings, regional analysis, highest-performer themes, and structural concerns shaping the lowest-performing countries.

  • Complete 2026 countries benchmark report
  • Individual Research License digital edition
  • Full rankings, findings, and interpretive analysis
  • Instant online purchase and delivery through Gumroad
Individual Research License

2026 Countries Compassion Benchmark Index

$195

Single-user digital research report

  • Designed for researchers, journalists, students, and policy professionals
  • Immediate digital access after purchase
  • Personal research use
  • No redistribution or resale
Buy on Gumroad

Assess your organization

Organizations that want to move from public benchmark visibility into structured self-review or formal assessment work can start here.

Start assessment

Public benchmark first. Premium depth when needed.

Every index page is designed to stand on its own as a public benchmark publication. Organizations that need more can purchase premium reports, license benchmark data, request interpretive support, or engage in structured assessment and enterprise relationships. The first of these premium report products is now live: the 2026 Countries Compassion Benchmark Index.

How the benchmark stays free and funded

  • Public benchmark pages: freely accessible rankings and findings
  • Premium reports: professional PDF and bundled benchmark products
  • Data licensing: structured datasets and usage rights
  • Advisory: interpretation, peer comparison, and strategic guidance
  • Certified assessments: formal review services
  • Enterprise agreements: recurring institutional relationships

Independence policy

  • Entities do not pay to be included in indexes
  • Entities do not pay to improve a score or rank
  • Public index publication is independent of commercial services
  • Paid offerings support access, analysis, review, and institutional use
  • The benchmark is designed to be difficult to game

Indexes — frequently asked questions

What does the Compassion Benchmark measure across all indexes?
Every index measures the same thing: how reliably an institution recognizes, responds to, and reduces the suffering of the people it affects. All 1,286 entities — governments, companies, AI labs, robotics labs, U.S. states, cities, and universities — are scored on the same 8-dimension, 0–100 ruler. A score of 50 means the same thing whether it appears in the Countries Index or the Fortune 500 Index.
Are the 8 indexes directly comparable across sectors?
Yes. The benchmark uses an identical 8-dimension framework (Awareness, Empathy, Action, Equity, Boundaries, Accountability, Systemic Thinking, Integrity) across all indexes. The scoring scale (0–100) and five bands (Critical 0–20 · Developing 20–40 · Functional 40–60 · Established 60–80 · Exemplary 80–100) are the same in every index. A country and a corporation with the same score have passed the same evidentiary tests on the same criteria.
How often are index scores updated?
The nightly pipeline scans the monitored entity catalog and publishes a daily briefing every weekday. Score changes are proposed when new public evidence crosses the threshold for a dimension change. Most days include confirmations (scores re-examined and held) alongside any proposals. All updates are free to read on the Daily Briefing page.
Do entities pay to be included or to improve their score?
No. Public index inclusion is independent. Entities do not pay for inclusion, score changes, or suppression of findings. Paid services — premium reports, data licenses, advisory, certified assessments — are built around access, interpretation, and institutional use only. The commercial and scoring functions are fully separated.
What do the five bands mean — Critical, Developing, Functional, Established, Exemplary?
The five bands divide the 0–100 scale into equal 20-point segments. Critical (0–20): foundational practices absent or active harm documented. Developing (20–40): some practices emerging but inconsistent. Functional (40–60): core practices present with significant gaps. Established (60–80): practices systematic, documented, evidenced. Exemplary (80–100): independently verified, consistent, sustained under pressure.
What is a composite score and how is it built?
A composite score is the entity's overall 0–100 benchmark result, derived from its 8 dimension scores. Each dimension is rated on a 0–5 anchor scale (five behavioral anchors per subdimension, five subdimensions per dimension), then normalized to 0–100 and combined. The composite reflects the center of gravity across all 8 dimensions — no single dimension can carry the composite without evidence across the others.

Every index page is free to read. When you need more, go deeper.

Inclusion and scores are never for sale. Paid products cover access, interpretation, and licensing only.