Compassion Benchmark
Independent benchmark research for institutions

Benchmarking how institutions recognize, respond to, and reduce suffering

Compassion Benchmark publishes comparative benchmark research across governments, public systems, corporations, AI labs, and humanoid robotics labs using a structured institutional compassion framework. The benchmark is designed to make compassionate performance legible, comparable, and difficult to fake.

1,155Entities currently benchmarked
7Published index families
8Core benchmark dimensions
40Subdimensions in full standard

Current publication set

IndexCoverage
World Countries207 countries and territories
U.S. States50 states and the District of Columbia
Fortune 500447 published company rankings
AI Labs50 leading AI labs
Humanoid Robotics LabsTop 50 global labs
U.S. CitiesTop 150 American cities
Global CitiesTop 250 cities worldwide

Public rankings are published independently. Commercial offerings support access, interpretation, licensing, assessment, and enterprise use — never paid ranking changes.

Latest evidence · 2026-05-29

Today's research

0 entities scanned · 20 assessed · 89 score changesView full briefing →

Afghanistan

Countries
0

Floor confirmation at 0.0. METHODOLOGY RULING: GENDER-APARTHEID-FORMAL-RECOGNITION formalized as independent 0.0-floor-qualifying category (...

00

UnitedHealth Group

Fortune 500
-1.2

Downgrade 11.4 -> 10.2. CEO Witty departed abruptly mid-May amid expanding DOJ criminal probe (now incl. Optum Rx physician comp); AI-claim-...

11.410.2
Highlight

The J&J framing correction matters beyond a single entity. The SETTLEMENT-WITHOUT-ADMISSION ruling establishes the framework for evaluating every future large-scale tort settlement in the Fortune 500 index. The two-sided structure — partial reparative credit for compensation delivery, capped by the absence of any admission — is a common pattern that has not previously had a formalized scoring protocol.

Weekly compassion score highlights

Top findings across 1,155 entities, every Friday. Free.

A benchmark institution, not a campaign site

The platform is organized around comparative publication, methodology transparency, structured evidence, and institutional services. It is designed for executives, researchers, boards, journalists, policy teams, investors, and technology leaders who need a serious way to evaluate compassionate institutional behavior across sectors.

How the benchmark works

The framework measures institutions across eight dimensions: Awareness, Empathy, Action, Equity, Boundaries, Accountability, Systems Thinking, and Integrity.

Published scores are derived from public evidence and normalized to a 0–100 scale with an integration adjustment that rewards consistency and penalizes active documented harm.

View Methodology

Current research program

The benchmark has moved from concept to active publication. The current program includes live index reports, a formal methodology, a broader 40-subdimension standard, and an operating model for future data products, certified assessments, and enterprise benchmark services.

Explore Research

Independence policy

  • Entities do not pay to be included in an index
  • Entities do not pay to improve their score or rank
  • Commercial services do not suppress public findings
  • Benchmark methodology is not sold to fit a preferred outcome
  • Paid offerings support access, interpretation, review, and institutional use

Best starting paths

Start with the public benchmark. Go deeper when needed.

The site is designed to let visitors move from public rankings to methodology, from methodology to research, and from research into premium services such as report purchases, data licensing, advisory consulting, certified assessments, and enterprise agreements.